Roundcube Webmail 1.6 (LTS)
Roundcube Webmail 1.6 (LTS)
Third-party support for the Roundcube Webmail 1.6 (LTS): 24/7 engineers manage issues, remediate vulnerabilities, and help you maintain compliance — independent of the vendor contract.
24/7 engineers own your Roundcube Webmail 1.6 (LTS) incidents end to end.
Mitigation and patch-around guidance when the vendor no longer ships fixes.
Controls evidence and documentation that keep auditors satisfied.
Specifications
- product
- roundcube
- release
- 1.6
- product Label
- Roundcube Webmail
- release Label
- 1.6 (LTS)
- codename
- lts
- true
- latest Version
- 1.6.21
- release Date
- 2022-07-25
- maintained
- true
- source Url
- https://endoflife.date/roundcube
Lifecycle Dates
- Last OEM Support
- May 10, 2026
OEM vs. 3rd Party Support
See how third-party support compares to the vendor contract for Roundcube Webmail 1.6 (LTS) — monitoring, break/fix, vulnerability work, operations and compliance, before and after EOSL.
| Feature | OEM Support | 3rd Party Support |
|---|---|---|
| Post-EOSL Support | ||
| Break/Fix Support | Until EOSL | |
| 24/7 Monitoring | ||
| Vulnerability Scanning & Remediation | ||
| Managed Operations | ||
| Procedure & Configuration Review | ||
| Compliance & Audit Documentation | Limited | |
| Discounted Migration to Other Platforms |
Why Choose 3rd Party Support for Roundcube Webmail 1.6 (LTS)?
Vulnerability Remediation
Scanning, mitigation and patch-around guidance for Roundcube Webmail 1.6 (LTS) when the vendor no longer ships fixes.
Compliance Maintenance
Procedure review, controls evidence and the documentation auditors ask for — maintained continuously, not scrambled at audit time.
24/7 Expert Support
Engineers who know this release monitor, manage and fix issues around the clock — break/fix to managed operations.
Roundcube Webmail 1.6 (LTS) Support: Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Roundcube Webmail 1.6 (LTS) still supported?
Yes. The Roundcube Webmail 1.6 (LTS) is currently supported by Roundcube Webmail, and third-party support is available as an alternative — issue management, vulnerability remediation, and compliance help independent of the vendor contract.
How much does third-party support for the Roundcube Webmail 1.6 (LTS) cost?
Typically 40-70% below the OEM maintenance renewal price. Exact pricing depends on quantity, service level and location. You get an indicative price within 24 hours and a firm quote within 48.
Known Vulnerabilities Affecting Roundcube Webmail 1.6 (LTS)
55 published CVEs affect the Roundcube Webmail 1.6 (LTS), including 15 rated critical or high severity. Our 24/7 engineers help you assess exposure, prioritize fixes and apply available patches.
| CVE | Severity | CVSS | Published | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-49113 | CRITICAL | 9.9 | Jun 2, 2025 | Roundcube Webmail before 1.5.10 and 1.6.x before 1.6.11 allows remote code execution by authenticated users because the _from parameter in a URL is not validated in program/actions/settings/upload.php, leading to PHP Object Deserialization. |
| CVE-2024-37385 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Jun 7, 2024 | Roundcube Webmail before 1.5.7 and 1.6.x before 1.6.7 on Windows allows command injection via im_convert_path and im_identify_path. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12641. |
| CVE-2024-42009 | CRITICAL | 9.3 | Aug 5, 2024 | A Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in Roundcube through 1.5.7 and 1.6.x through 1.6.7 allows a remote attacker to steal and send emails of a victim via a crafted e-mail message that abuses a Desanitization issue in message_body() in program/actions/mail/show.php. |
| CVE-2024-42008 | CRITICAL | 9.3 | Aug 5, 2024 | A Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in rcmail_action_mail_get->run() in Roundcube through 1.5.7 and 1.6.x through 1.6.7 allows a remote attacker to steal and send emails of a victim via a malicious e-mail attachment served with a dangerous Content-Type header. |
| CVE-2026-74997 | HIGH | 8.8 | Aug 17, 2026 | In Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.18 and 1.7.x before 1.7.3, the cmd_learn driver of the markasjunk plugin is subject to remote code execution via crafted placeholder replacement values. This issue only affects Roundcube instances using the markasjunk plugin with its cmd_learn driver. |
| CVE-2026-114716 | HIGH | 8.5 | Oct 22, 2026 | Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 is affected by a mail header injection vulnerability. rcmail_sendmail::extract_inline_images() used the media type taken from an inline image data URI without validating it, so a remote authenticated attacker could inject arbitrary MIME part headers into the outgoing message by placing CRLF sequences in that media type. Upstream fixed this in the commit “Fix mail header injection via media type in an inline image data URI”, which validates t |
| CVE-2026-114727 | HIGH | 8.3 | Oct 22, 2026 | Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 passes potentially unsafe content into ImageMagick when resizing images. SVG and EPS were accepted as valid image types for contact photo upload and conversion, and both formats can reference external resources and invoke ImageMagick delegates when processed. Upstream fixed this in the commit “Fix passing potentally unsafe attachment content into ImageMagick on image resize”, which removes svg and eps from the accepted types. |
| CVE-2026-114724 | HIGH | 7.4 | Oct 22, 2026 | Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 contains an object injection primitive in rcube_session::unserialize(). A session key prefixed with “!” was treated as having no value, and the reconstructed serialized string was emitted with a key but no corresponding value, desynchronizing the remainder of the input so that following session data was interpreted as a serialized value. This yields a PHP object injection primitive for an attacker able to influence stored session data. Upstr |
| CVE-2026-74998 | HIGH | 7.2 | Aug 17, 2026 | In Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.18 and 1.7.x before 1.7.3, responses from the CSS (Cascading Style Sheets) proxy were not validated, which may result in information disclosure or XSS (cross-site scripting) via MIME sniffing. |
| CVE-2026-54433 | HIGH | 7.2 | Jul 14, 2026 | In Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.17 and 1.7.x before 1.7.2, there is Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) via a crafted plain-text email message. The attacker-controlled JavaScript executes within the victim's authenticated session simply by opening or previewing the message (zero-click). |
| CVE-2026-62643 | HIGH | 7.2 | Jul 14, 2026 | In Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.17 and 1.7.x before 1.7.2, insufficient Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) sanitization in HTML e-mail messages may lead to SSRF or Information Disclosure, e.g., if stylesheet links point to local network hosts. NOTE: this issue exists because of insufficient fixes for CVE-2026-35540 and CVE-2026-48843. |
| CVE-2025-68461 | HIGH | 7.2 | Dec 18, 2025 | Roundcube Webmail before 1.5.12 and 1.6 before 1.6.12 is prone to a Cross-Site-Scripting (XSS) vulnerability via the animate tag in an SVG document. |
| CVE-2025-68460 | HIGH | 7.2 | Dec 18, 2025 | Roundcube Webmail before 1.5.12 and 1.6 before 1.6.12 is prone to a information disclosure vulnerability in the HTML style sanitizer. |
| CVE-2026-114720 | HIGH | 7.1 | Oct 22, 2026 | Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 is affected by an IMAP command injection vulnerability. A remote authenticated attacker can exploit this via CRLF sequences injected into the _flag parameter of the mail/mark action to execute arbitrary IMAP commands. Upstream fixed this in the commit “Fix IMAP command injection via CRLF in `_flag` parameter of mail/mark action”, which rejects flags containing control, whitespace and IMAP-special characters. |
| CVE-2026-75002 | HIGH | 7.1 | Aug 17, 2026 | In Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.18 and 1.7.x before 1.7.3, mail search and LITERAL+ byte-count desynchronization could lead to information disclosure or privilege escalation via IMAP command injection. |
| CVE-2026-114732 | MEDIUM | 6.8 | Oct 22, 2026 | Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 is affected by an improper authentication vulnerability in multi-host installations. When a user logs in with an alias address, rcube_user::query() matched the address against identity records without qualifying the lookup by IMAP host, so a login could be resolved to a user account belonging to a different IMAP host. Upstream fixed this in the commit “Fix bug where an alias login wasn’t qualified by IMAP host”. |
| CVE-2026-114715 | MEDIUM | 6.8 | Oct 22, 2026 | Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 is affected by an incorrect authorization vulnerability in the Modoboa driver of the password plugin. The driver took the first entry of the account search result returned by the Modoboa API instead of matching the authenticated user, so a password change could be applied to a different account. Upstream fixed this in the commit “Fix bug where Password Modoboa driver could change password for another account”, which selects the account whose |
| CVE-2026-114722 | MEDIUM | 6.5 | Oct 22, 2026 | Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 is affected by a CSS scoping bypass in HTML messages. rcube_utils::mod_css_styles() did not treat an at-rule prologue such as @layer a; as a selector boundary, and did not handle selectors beginning with ::, so selectors following an at-rule were left unscoped and applied to the whole Roundcube interface instead of being confined to the message body. This allows an HTML message to restyle application chrome for UI redressing and spoofing. Up |
| CVE-2026-75010 | MEDIUM | 6.4 | Aug 17, 2026 | In Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.18 and 1.7.x before 1.7.3, the modoboa driver of the password plugin could leak a Modoboa API authentication token to a user-controlled host via crafted session data. This issue only affects Roundcube instances using the password plugin with its modoboa driver. |
| CVE-2026-62644 | MEDIUM | 6.4 | Jul 14, 2026 | In Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.17 and 1.7.x before 1.7.2, the password plugin of the Roundcube Webmail was subject to username spoofing via session data, which could lead to account takeover. |
Showing the 20 most severe of 55 known CVEs.
Get Third Party Support