Android OS 1.1 'Petit Four'
Android OS 1.1 'Petit Four'
Third-party support for the Google Android OS 1.1 'Petit Four': 24/7 engineers manage issues, remediate vulnerabilities, and help you maintain compliance — independent of the vendor contract.
24/7 engineers own your Android OS 1.1 'Petit Four' incidents end to end.
Mitigation and patch-around guidance when the vendor no longer ships fixes.
Controls evidence and documentation that keep auditors satisfied.
Specifications
- product
- android
- release
- 1.1
- product Label
- Android OS
- release Label
- 1.1 'Petit Four'
- codename
- Petit Four
- lts
- latest Version
- release Date
- 2009-02-09
- maintained
- source Url
- https://endoflife.date/android
OEM vs. 3rd Party Support
See how third-party support compares to the vendor contract for Android OS 1.1 'Petit Four' — monitoring, break/fix, vulnerability work, operations and compliance, before and after EOSL.
| Feature | OEM Support | 3rd Party Support |
|---|---|---|
| Post-EOSL Support | ||
| Break/Fix Support | Until EOSL | |
| 24/7 Monitoring | ||
| Vulnerability Scanning & Remediation | ||
| Managed Operations | ||
| Procedure & Configuration Review | ||
| Compliance & Audit Documentation | Limited | |
| Discounted Migration to Other Platforms |
Why Choose 3rd Party Support for Android OS 1.1 'Petit Four'?
Vulnerability Remediation
Scanning, mitigation and patch-around guidance for Android OS 1.1 'Petit Four' when the vendor no longer ships fixes.
Compliance Maintenance
Procedure review, controls evidence and the documentation auditors ask for — maintained continuously, not scrambled at audit time.
24/7 Expert Support
Engineers who know this release monitor, manage and fix issues around the clock — break/fix to managed operations.
Android OS 1.1 'Petit Four' Support: Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Google Android OS 1.1 'Petit Four' still supported?
Yes. The Android OS 1.1 'Petit Four' is currently supported by Google, and third-party support is available as an alternative — issue management, vulnerability remediation, and compliance help independent of the vendor contract.
How much does third-party support for the Android OS 1.1 'Petit Four' cost?
Typically 40-70% below the OEM maintenance renewal price. Exact pricing depends on quantity, service level and location — request a quote and we respond within 24 hours.
Known Vulnerabilities Affecting Android OS 1.1 'Petit Four'
2406 published CVEs affect the Google Android OS 1.1 'Petit Four', including 1677 rated critical or high severity. Our 24/7 engineers help you assess exposure, prioritize fixes and apply available patches.
| CVE | Severity | CVSS | Published | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-0124 | CRITICAL | 10.0 | Mar 10, 2026 | There is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2025-48611 | CRITICAL | 10.0 | Mar 10, 2026 | In DeviceId of DeviceId.java, there is a possible desync in persistence due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2024-47040 | CRITICAL | 10.0 | Dec 18, 2024 | There is a possible UAF due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2024-47038 | CRITICAL | 10.0 | Dec 18, 2024 | In dhd_prot_flowrings_pool_release of dhd_msgbuf.c, there is a possible outcof bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to localcescalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. Usercinteraction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2018-9416 | CRITICAL | 10.0 | Dec 5, 2024 | In sg_remove_scat of scsi/sg.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to an unusual root cause. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0126 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Jun 16, 2026 | In WC-Radio, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0120 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Mar 10, 2026 | In modem, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0116 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Mar 10, 2026 | In __mfc_handle_released_buf of mfc_core_isr.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0114 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Mar 10, 2026 | In Modem, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0113 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Mar 10, 2026 | In ns_GetUserData of ns_SmscbUtilities.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0111 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Mar 10, 2026 | In ns_GetUserData of ns_SmscbUtilities.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0110 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Mar 10, 2026 | In MM_DATA_IND of cn_NrSmMsgHdlrFromMM.cpp, there is a possible EoP due to memory corruption. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2025-36937 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Dec 11, 2025 | In AudioDecoder::HandleProduceRequest of audio_decoder.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2025-36904 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Sep 4, 2025 | WLAN in Android before 2025-09-05 on Google Pixel devices allows elevation of privilege, aka A-396458384. |
| CVE-2025-36897 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Sep 4, 2025 | In unknown of cd_CnMsgCodecUserApi.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2025-36896 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Sep 4, 2025 | WLAN in Android before 2025-09-05 on Google Pixel devices allows elevation of privilege, aka A-394765106. |
| CVE-2025-36890 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Sep 4, 2025 | Elevation of Privilege |
| CVE-2024-53842 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Jan 3, 2025 | In cc_SendCcImsInfoIndMsg of cc_MmConManagement.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2018-9388 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Dec 5, 2024 | In store_upgrade and store_cmd of drivers/input/touchscreen/stm/ftm4_pdc.c, there are out of bound writes due to missing bounds checks or integer underflows. These could lead to escalation of privilege. |
| CVE-2024-32913 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Jun 13, 2024 | In wl_notify_rx_mgmt_frame of wl_cfg80211.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
Showing the 20 most severe of 2406 known CVEs.
Get Third Party Support