Android OS 11 'Red Velvet Cake'
Android OS 11 'Red Velvet Cake'
The Google Android OS 11 'Red Velvet Cake' reached end of service life on Feb 5, 2024 — Google no longer ships security patches or fixes for it. Our third-party support keeps it safe to run: 24/7 engineers manage issues, remediate vulnerabilities, and help you maintain compliance.
24/7 engineers own your Android OS 11 'Red Velvet Cake' incidents end to end.
Mitigation and patch-around guidance when the vendor no longer ships fixes.
Controls evidence and documentation that keep auditors satisfied.
Specifications
- product
- android
- release
- 11
- product Label
- Android OS
- release Label
- 11 'Red Velvet Cake'
- codename
- Red Velvet Cake
- lts
- latest Version
- release Date
- 2020-09-08
- maintained
- source Url
- https://endoflife.date/android
Lifecycle Dates
- End of Service Life
- Feb 5, 2024
- Last OEM Support
- Feb 5, 2024
OEM vs. 3rd Party Support
See how third-party support compares to the vendor contract for Android OS 11 'Red Velvet Cake' — monitoring, break/fix, vulnerability work, operations and compliance, before and after EOSL.
| Feature | OEM Support | 3rd Party Support |
|---|---|---|
| Post-EOSL Support | ||
| Break/Fix Support | Until EOSL | |
| 24/7 Monitoring | ||
| Vulnerability Scanning & Remediation | ||
| Managed Operations | ||
| Procedure & Configuration Review | ||
| Compliance & Audit Documentation | Limited | |
| Discounted Migration to Other Platforms |
Why Choose 3rd Party Support for Android OS 11 'Red Velvet Cake'?
Vulnerability Remediation
Scanning, mitigation and patch-around guidance for Android OS 11 'Red Velvet Cake' when the vendor no longer ships fixes.
Compliance Maintenance
Procedure review, controls evidence and the documentation auditors ask for — maintained continuously, not scrambled at audit time.
24/7 Expert Support
Engineers who know this release monitor, manage and fix issues around the clock — break/fix to managed operations.
Android OS 11 'Red Velvet Cake' Support: Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Google Android OS 11 'Red Velvet Cake' still supported?
Google ended support for the Android OS 11 'Red Velvet Cake' on Feb 5, 2024 — no more patches or fixes from the vendor. Third-party support keeps it covered: our engineers manage issues, remediate vulnerabilities, and help you maintain compliance for as long as you run it.
When is the Google Android OS 11 'Red Velvet Cake' end of service life (EOSL) date?
Google lists the end of service life for the Android OS 11 'Red Velvet Cake' as Feb 5, 2024.
Can I keep using the Android OS 11 'Red Velvet Cake' after its EOSL date?
Yes. EOSL means Google stops issuing patches and support — the software itself keeps running. Third-party support covers it from there: issue management, security vulnerability remediation, and the compliance documentation auditors ask for, for as long as you choose to run it.
How much does third-party support for the Android OS 11 'Red Velvet Cake' cost?
Typically 40-70% below the OEM maintenance renewal price. Exact pricing depends on quantity, service level and location — request a quote and we respond within 24 hours.
Known Vulnerabilities Affecting Android OS 11 'Red Velvet Cake'
3963 published CVEs affect the Google Android OS 11 'Red Velvet Cake', including 1897 rated critical or high severity. Google no longer ships security patches for this release — our engineers provide mitigation guidance, workarounds and hardening support.
| CVE | Severity | CVSS | Published | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-0124 | CRITICAL | 10.0 | Mar 10, 2026 | There is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2025-48611 | CRITICAL | 10.0 | Mar 10, 2026 | In DeviceId of DeviceId.java, there is a possible desync in persistence due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2024-47040 | CRITICAL | 10.0 | Dec 18, 2024 | There is a possible UAF due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2024-47038 | CRITICAL | 10.0 | Dec 18, 2024 | In dhd_prot_flowrings_pool_release of dhd_msgbuf.c, there is a possible outcof bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to localcescalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. Usercinteraction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2018-9416 | CRITICAL | 10.0 | Dec 5, 2024 | In sg_remove_scat of scsi/sg.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to an unusual root cause. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0126 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Jun 16, 2026 | In WC-Radio, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0120 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Mar 10, 2026 | In modem, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0116 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Mar 10, 2026 | In __mfc_handle_released_buf of mfc_core_isr.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0114 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Mar 10, 2026 | In Modem, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0113 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Mar 10, 2026 | In ns_GetUserData of ns_SmscbUtilities.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0111 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Mar 10, 2026 | In ns_GetUserData of ns_SmscbUtilities.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0110 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Mar 10, 2026 | In MM_DATA_IND of cn_NrSmMsgHdlrFromMM.cpp, there is a possible EoP due to memory corruption. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2025-36937 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Dec 11, 2025 | In AudioDecoder::HandleProduceRequest of audio_decoder.cc, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2025-36904 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Sep 4, 2025 | WLAN in Android before 2025-09-05 on Google Pixel devices allows elevation of privilege, aka A-396458384. |
| CVE-2025-36897 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Sep 4, 2025 | In unknown of cd_CnMsgCodecUserApi.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2025-36896 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Sep 4, 2025 | WLAN in Android before 2025-09-05 on Google Pixel devices allows elevation of privilege, aka A-394765106. |
| CVE-2025-36890 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Sep 4, 2025 | Elevation of Privilege |
| CVE-2024-53842 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Jan 3, 2025 | In cc_SendCcImsInfoIndMsg of cc_MmConManagement.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2018-9388 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Dec 5, 2024 | In store_upgrade and store_cmd of drivers/input/touchscreen/stm/ftm4_pdc.c, there are out of bound writes due to missing bounds checks or integer underflows. These could lead to escalation of privilege. |
| CVE-2024-32913 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Jun 13, 2024 | In wl_notify_rx_mgmt_frame of wl_cfg80211.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
Showing the 20 most severe of 3963 known CVEs.
Get Third Party Support