Android OS 14 'Upside Down Cake'
Android OS 14 'Upside Down Cake'
Third-party support for the Google Android OS 14 'Upside Down Cake': 24/7 engineers manage issues, remediate vulnerabilities, and help you maintain compliance — independent of the vendor contract.
24/7 engineers own your Android OS 14 'Upside Down Cake' incidents end to end.
Mitigation and patch-around guidance when the vendor no longer ships fixes.
Controls evidence and documentation that keep auditors satisfied.
Specifications
- product
- android
- release
- 14
- product Label
- Android OS
- release Label
- 14 'Upside Down Cake'
- codename
- Upside Down Cake
- lts
- latest Version
- release Date
- 2023-10-04
- maintained
- true
- source Url
- https://endoflife.date/android
OEM vs. 3rd Party Support
See how third-party support compares to the vendor contract for Android OS 14 'Upside Down Cake' — monitoring, break/fix, vulnerability work, operations and compliance, before and after EOSL.
| Feature | OEM Support | 3rd Party Support |
|---|---|---|
| Post-EOSL Support | ||
| Break/Fix Support | Until EOSL | |
| 24/7 Monitoring | ||
| Vulnerability Scanning & Remediation | ||
| Managed Operations | ||
| Procedure & Configuration Review | ||
| Compliance & Audit Documentation | Limited | |
| Discounted Migration to Other Platforms |
Why Choose 3rd Party Support for Android OS 14 'Upside Down Cake'?
Vulnerability Remediation
Scanning, mitigation and patch-around guidance for Android OS 14 'Upside Down Cake' when the vendor no longer ships fixes.
Compliance Maintenance
Procedure review, controls evidence and the documentation auditors ask for — maintained continuously, not scrambled at audit time.
24/7 Expert Support
Engineers who know this release monitor, manage and fix issues around the clock — break/fix to managed operations.
Android OS 14 'Upside Down Cake' Support: Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Google Android OS 14 'Upside Down Cake' still supported?
Yes. The Android OS 14 'Upside Down Cake' is currently supported by Google, and third-party support is available as an alternative — issue management, vulnerability remediation, and compliance help independent of the vendor contract.
How much does third-party support for the Android OS 14 'Upside Down Cake' cost?
Typically 40-70% below the OEM maintenance renewal price. Exact pricing depends on quantity, service level and location. You get an indicative price within 24 hours and a firm quote within 48.
Known Vulnerabilities Affecting Android OS 14 'Upside Down Cake'
2739 published CVEs affect the Google Android OS 14 'Upside Down Cake', including 1792 rated critical or high severity. Our 24/7 engineers help you assess exposure, prioritize fixes and apply available patches.
| CVE | Severity | CVSS | Published | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-49883 | CRITICAL | 10.0 | Sep 8, 2026 | In checkReadPermission of PermissionsManager.java, there is a possible way to monitor sensitive device state data due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-28573 | CRITICAL | 10.0 | Jun 18, 2026 | In AndroidManifest.xml, there is a possible persistent denial of service due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0124 | CRITICAL | 10.0 | Mar 10, 2026 | There is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2025-48611 | CRITICAL | 10.0 | Mar 10, 2026 | In DeviceId of DeviceId.java, there is a possible desync in persistence due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2024-47040 | CRITICAL | 10.0 | Dec 18, 2024 | There is a possible UAF due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2024-47038 | CRITICAL | 10.0 | Dec 18, 2024 | In dhd_prot_flowrings_pool_release of dhd_msgbuf.c, there is a possible outcof bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to localcescalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. Usercinteraction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2018-9416 | CRITICAL | 10.0 | Dec 5, 2024 | In sg_remove_scat of scsi/sg.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to an unusual root cause. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58936 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Nov 2, 2026 | In png_set_tRNS of pngset.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to a use-after-free. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58876 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Nov 2, 2026 | In multiple locations, there is a possible memory safety issue due to a use-after-free. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58868 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Nov 2, 2026 | In onOutputReceived of FrameDecoder.cpp, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-56960 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Sep 15, 2026 | In multiple locations, there is a possible use-after-free due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-55366 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Sep 15, 2026 | In IP Multimedia Subsystem, there is a possible authentication bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-58822 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Sep 8, 2026 | In multiple functions of ftsmooth.c, there is a possible memory safety issue due to improper casting. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-49921 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Sep 8, 2026 | In multiple locations, there is a possible memory safety issue due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0163 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Aug 4, 2026 | In multiple functions of vpu_ioctl.c, there is a possible use after free due to a use after free. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0126 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Jun 16, 2026 | In WC-Radio, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0120 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Mar 10, 2026 | In modem, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0116 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Mar 10, 2026 | In __mfc_handle_released_buf of mfc_core_isr.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0114 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Mar 10, 2026 | In Modem, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| CVE-2026-0113 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Mar 10, 2026 | In ns_GetUserData of ns_SmscbUtilities.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
Showing the 20 most severe of 2739 known CVEs.
Get Third Party Support