OpenSSL
OpenSSL 1.0.2 (LTS)
OpenSSL 1.0.2 (LTS)
The OpenSSL 1.0.2 (LTS) reached end of service life on Dec 31, 2019. Third-party maintenance keeps it supported — 24/7 engineering support and same-day replacement parts — at 40-70% below OEM renewal pricing.
End of Service LifeEOSL Date: Dec 31, 2019
Specifications
- product
- openssl
- release
- 1.0.2
- product Label
- OpenSSL
- release Label
- 1.0.2 (LTS)
- codename
- lts
- true
- latest Version
- 1.0.2u
- release Date
- 2015-01-22
- maintained
- true
- source Url
- https://endoflife.date/openssl
Lifecycle Dates
- End of Service Life
- Dec 31, 2019
- Last OEM Support
- Dec 31, 2019
OEM vs. 3rd Party Support
See how 3rd party maintenance compares to traditional OEM support for your OpenSSL 1.0.2 (LTS). Get the same level of service at a fraction of the cost.
| Feature | OEM Support | 3rd Party Support |
|---|---|---|
| Post-EOSL Support | ||
| 24/7/365 Support | ||
| Same-Day Parts Replacement | Limited | |
| Mixed-Vendor Support | ||
| Flexible Contract Terms | Annual Only | Month-to-Month Available |
| Asset Lifecycle Extension | ||
| OEM-Trained Engineers |
Why Choose 3rd Party Support for OpenSSL 1.0.2 (LTS)?
Save 40-70%
Dramatically reduce your maintenance costs while maintaining the same level of support coverage.
Extend Asset Life
Continue using your OpenSSL 1.0.2 (LTS) well beyond the OEM end-of-life date.
24/7 Expert Support
OEM-trained engineers available around the clock with same-day parts replacement.
OpenSSL 1.0.2 (LTS) Support: Frequently Asked Questions
Is the OpenSSL 1.0.2 (LTS) still supported?
OpenSSL ended support for the OpenSSL 1.0.2 (LTS) on Dec 31, 2019. Third-party maintenance remains available and keeps the OpenSSL 1.0.2 (LTS) supported with 24/7 engineering support and same-day replacement parts.
When is the OpenSSL 1.0.2 (LTS) end of service life (EOSL) date?
OpenSSL lists the end of service life for the OpenSSL 1.0.2 (LTS) as Dec 31, 2019.
Can I keep using the OpenSSL 1.0.2 (LTS) after its EOSL date?
Yes. EOSL means OpenSSL stops selling support contracts and issuing updates — the equipment itself keeps working. Third-party maintenance provides engineering support and replacement parts for as long as you choose to run it.
How much does third-party support for the OpenSSL 1.0.2 (LTS) cost?
Typically 40-70% below the OEM maintenance renewal price. Exact pricing depends on quantity, service level and location — request a quote and we respond within 24 hours.
Known Vulnerabilities Affecting OpenSSL 1.0.2 (LTS)
66 published CVEs affect the OpenSSL 1.0.2 (LTS), including 24 rated critical or high severity. OpenSSL no longer ships security patches for this release — our engineers provide mitigation guidance, workarounds and hardening support.
| CVE | Severity | CVSS | Published | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-6303 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Sep 16, 2016 | Integer overflow in the MDC2_Update function in crypto/mdc2/mdc2dgst.c in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds write and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2016-2182 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Sep 16, 2016 | The BN_bn2dec function in crypto/bn/bn_print.c in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 does not properly validate division results, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds write and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via unknown vectors. |
| CVE-2016-2177 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Jun 20, 2016 | OpenSSL through 1.0.2h incorrectly uses pointer arithmetic for heap-buffer boundary checks, which might allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (integer overflow and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact by leveraging unexpected malloc behavior, related to s3_srvr.c, ssl_sess.c, and t1_lib.c. |
| CVE-2016-2108 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | May 5, 2016 | The ASN.1 implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1o and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2c allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (buffer underflow and memory corruption) via an ANY field in crafted serialized data, aka the "negative zero" issue. |
| CVE-2016-2842 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Mar 3, 2016 | The doapr_outch function in crypto/bio/b_print.c in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g does not verify that a certain memory allocation succeeds, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds write or memory consumption) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a long string, as demonstrated by a large amount of ASN.1 data, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-0799. |
| CVE-2016-0799 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Mar 3, 2016 | The fmtstr function in crypto/bio/b_print.c in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g improperly calculates string lengths, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (overflow and out-of-bounds read) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a long string, as demonstrated by a large amount of ASN.1 data, a different vulnerability than CVE-2016-2842. |
| CVE-2016-0705 | CRITICAL | 9.8 | Mar 3, 2016 | Double free vulnerability in the dsa_priv_decode function in crypto/dsa/dsa_ameth.c in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a malformed DSA private key. |
| CVE-2016-2176 | HIGH | 8.2 | May 5, 2016 | The X509_NAME_oneline function in crypto/x509/x509_obj.c in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process stack memory or cause a denial of service (buffer over-read) via crafted EBCDIC ASN.1 data. |
| CVE-2018-0732 | HIGH | 7.5 | Jun 12, 2018 | During key agreement in a TLS handshake using a DH(E) based ciphersuite a malicious server can send a very large prime value to the client. This will cause the client to spend an unreasonably long period of time generating a key for this prime resulting in a hang until the client has finished. This could be exploited in a Denial Of Service attack. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0i-dev (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0h). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2p-dev (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2o). |
| CVE-2016-8610 | HIGH | 7.5 | Nov 13, 2017 | A denial of service flaw was found in OpenSSL 0.9.8, 1.0.1, 1.0.2 through 1.0.2h, and 1.1.0 in the way the TLS/SSL protocol defined processing of ALERT packets during a connection handshake. A remote attacker could use this flaw to make a TLS/SSL server consume an excessive amount of CPU and fail to accept connections from other clients. |
| CVE-2017-3731 | HIGH | 7.5 | May 4, 2017 | If an SSL/TLS server or client is running on a 32-bit host, and a specific cipher is being used, then a truncated packet can cause that server or client to perform an out-of-bounds read, usually resulting in a crash. For OpenSSL 1.1.0, the crash can be triggered when using CHACHA20/POLY1305; users should upgrade to 1.1.0d. For Openssl 1.0.2, the crash can be triggered when using RC4-MD5; users who have not disabled that algorithm should update to 1.0.2k. |
| CVE-2016-6304 | HIGH | 7.5 | Sep 26, 2016 | Multiple memory leaks in t1_lib.c in OpenSSL before 1.0.1u, 1.0.2 before 1.0.2i, and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0a allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via large OCSP Status Request extensions. |
| CVE-2016-6302 | HIGH | 7.5 | Sep 16, 2016 | The tls_decrypt_ticket function in ssl/t1_lib.c in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 does not consider the HMAC size during validation of the ticket length, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a ticket that is too short. |
| CVE-2016-2181 | HIGH | 7.5 | Sep 16, 2016 | The Anti-Replay feature in the DTLS implementation in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 mishandles early use of a new epoch number in conjunction with a large sequence number, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (false-positive packet drops) via spoofed DTLS records, related to rec_layer_d1.c and ssl3_record.c. |
| CVE-2016-2179 | HIGH | 7.5 | Sep 16, 2016 | The DTLS implementation in OpenSSL before 1.1.0 does not properly restrict the lifetime of queue entries associated with unused out-of-order messages, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by maintaining many crafted DTLS sessions simultaneously, related to d1_lib.c, statem_dtls.c, statem_lib.c, and statem_srvr.c. |
| CVE-2016-2180 | HIGH | 7.5 | Aug 1, 2016 | The TS_OBJ_print_bio function in crypto/ts/ts_lib.c in the X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Time-Stamp Protocol (TSP) implementation in OpenSSL through 1.0.2h allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read and application crash) via a crafted time-stamp file that is mishandled by the "openssl ts" command. |
| CVE-2016-2109 | HIGH | 7.5 | May 5, 2016 | The asn1_d2i_read_bio function in crypto/asn1/a_d2i_fp.c in the ASN.1 BIO implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a short invalid encoding. |
| CVE-2016-2106 | HIGH | 7.5 | May 5, 2016 | Integer overflow in the EVP_EncryptUpdate function in crypto/evp/evp_enc.c in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap memory corruption) via a large amount of data. |
| CVE-2016-2105 | HIGH | 7.5 | May 5, 2016 | Integer overflow in the EVP_EncodeUpdate function in crypto/evp/encode.c in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap memory corruption) via a large amount of binary data. |
| CVE-2016-0798 | HIGH | 7.5 | Mar 3, 2016 | Memory leak in the SRP_VBASE_get_by_user implementation in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by providing an invalid username in a connection attempt, related to apps/s_server.c and crypto/srp/srp_vfy.c. |
Showing the 20 most severe of 66 known CVEs.
Get Third Party SupportRelated OpenSSL Products
All OpenSSL products →OpenSSL 1.0.2 (LTS)
Save 40-70% vs OEM